This is the first study on the development of AI in the region carri out by Cenia, in collaboration with Google, AWS, Hub APTA, IDB, UNESCO. OAS and the HAI of Stanford University.
With a score of 48.5 out of 100, Mexico rank fifth in the first ition of the Latin American Artificial Intelligence Index (ILIA) of the National Center forArtificial intelligence(Cenia) from Chile.
The study review the situation in twelve countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru and Uruguay.
With the aim of developing a complete analysis of the current situation of theartificial intelligence(AI) in Latin America to identify common challenges and specific gaps in each country.
“This study brings to light the real
situation of countries in the region facing the challenge of AI, looking at the enabling. Factors they have to build these systems.
What is the level of laos whatsapp number data maturity and what are. The institutional frameworks on which these systems are built?
Said Rodrigo Durán, Director of Community Relations at Cenia.
Mexico stands out for research
In this comparison, Mexico obtain the best score in research with 71.4 points, follow by talent development with 51.3 points .
In the research area, it was highlight. That the community is mature. Large and productive; it stands out in early ucation in the area.
“Mexico stands out in AI literacy as it has early ucation that integrates ICT into the formal curriculum and offers open AI courses.
“Likewise, it leads the ranking of computer science graduates in Latin America . ”
Display in the Index.
Greater technological accessibility is ne
However, when it comes to device accessibility, Mexico is below the Latin American average.
Both in mobile device subscriptions and in the percentage of households that own a computer, he not.
“Promoting policies recreation emerges as a necessary tool for designers that improve access to technology in Mexican households could boost the rest of the indicators .”
Recommends the cg leads indicator .
In addition, the ne for greater progress in the vision and institutionality of these developments. Where only 2.77 points were obtain.